Company capitalization: The most overlooked definition in your SAFE
March 25, 2024 | Gabriel Riekhof
Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone. Gabriel Riekhof is an attorney at Husch Blackwell, a leading law firm that provides unparalleled service and industry-specific solutions to clients nationwide.
[divide]
Introduced by Y Combinator in 2013 as an alternative to traditional convertible notes, a “Simple Agreement for Future Equity” or “SAFE” aims to streamline the investment process for early-stage startups by providing a simpler instrument for selling equity.
Although the document has the word “simple” in the title, founders can rarely answer the most fundamental question posed by a SAFE: How many shares will the SAFE convert into?
This article aims to help you answer that question.
The Mechanics of a SAFE
Typically, there are two distinct forms of SAFE that Y Combinator publishes for a founder to choose from to incentivize an investor to purchase a SAFE: (i) the Discount SAFE and (ii) the Valuation Cap SAFE. This article discusses the Valuation Cap SAFE only.
In “simple” terms, a Valuation Cap SAFE sets an agreed upon maximum future valuation of the company issuing the SAFE that “caps” the per share “conversion price” used to convert the SAFE into preferred stock. All else equal, a lower valuation cap results in a lower per share conversion price. A lower conversion price means the investor’s original investment amount will purchase more shares. The more shares an investor receives, the greater the investor’s equity in the company, and therefore less equity remains with the founders.
At the risk of losing your interest this early in the article, I’m going to take a risk and give you the formula that governs the operation of a Valuation Cap SAFE. It does not have to make sense, yet. Just use it as a reference while you read the next paragraphs and examples:
S = P / CP
S = Shares of preferred stock that the SAFE will convert into.
P = Purchase Price of the SAFE (the investment amount).
CP = Conversion Price = X / Y.
X = Valuation Cap.
Y = Company Capitalization.
Example 1: Using the Valuation Cap
If an investor purchased a SAFE for $50,000 (P) with a $1,000,000 Valuation Cap (X), and the Company has a Company Capitalization of 1,000,000 (Y), then the Conversion Price is $1.00 (CP). The $50,000 investment would convert into 50,000 shares (S).
50,000 shares = $50,000 / $1.00 because the conversion price equals $1,000,000 / 1,000,000
Now, let’s increase the valuation cap to see the impact it has on the number of shares issued to the investor.
Example 2: Using the Valuation Cap (again)
If an investor purchased a SAFE for $50,000 (P) with a $10,000,000 Valuation Cap (X), and the Company has a Company Capitalization of 1,000,000 (Y), then the Conversion Price is $10.00 (CP). The $50,000 investment would convert into 5,000 shares (S).
5,000 shares = $50,000 / $10.00 because the conversion price equals $10,000,000 / 1,000,000
Immediately, you can see the magnifying effect the valuation cap has on the resulting number of shares of preferred stock issued to the investor.
Shifting Focus: Company Capitalization
In explaining the valuation cap formula above, I made the mistake that I see many founders make: I only focused on the conversion price’s numerator (the valuation cap, X) and I ignored the conversion price’s denominator (the company capitalization, Y).
But, what if, instead of manipulating the conversion price by increasing or decreasing the valuation cap, X, we negotiated a more advantageous company capitalization, Y? That is, what if we increased or decreased the denominator of the conversion price formula?
What is Company Capitalization?
First, “company capitalization” is an agreed upon value representing the number of shares the company has issued. Y Combinator’s standard definition includes an aggregate of the following shares (but remember, parties can negotiate this definition):
- All shares of capital stock issued and outstanding;
- All converting securities, such as SAFEs and convertible notes;
- All granted stock options; and
- All shares reserved for future grant under the company’s option plan.
Example 3: Using Company Capitalization
Using Y Combinator’s standard definition above, a company with 900,000 shares of common stock outstanding, no SAFEs or convertible debt, no options granted, and 100,000 shares reserved for issuance in the Company’s option pool has a “company capitalization” of 1,000,000. Remember, “company capitalization” is an aggregate of A through D above.
If an investor purchased a SAFE for $50,000 (P) with a $1,000,000 Valuation Cap (X), and the Company has a Company Capitalization of 1,000,000 (Y), then the Conversion Price is $1.00 (CP). The $50,000 investment would convert into 50,000 shares (S).
50,000 shares = $50,000 / $1.00 because the conversion price equals $1,000,000 / 1,000,000
Now, what if we changed the definition of “company capitalization” to exclude the shares we reserved for issuance in our option pool, but never issued?
Example 4: Excluding Option Pool Shares
If the definition of “company capitalization” excludes shares reserved for issuance under the company’s option plan, a company with 900,000 shares of common stock outstanding, no SAFEs issued, no options granted, and 100,000 shares reserved for issuance in the Company’s option pool has a Company Capitalization totaling 900,000.
If an investor purchased a SAFE for $50,000 (P) with a $1,000,000 Valuation Cap (X), and the Company has a Company Capitalization of 900,000 (Y), then the Conversion Price is $1.11 (CP). The $50,000 investment would convert into 45,000 shares (S).
45,000 shares = $50,000 / $1.11 because the conversion price equals $1,000,000 / 900,000
This definitional change of “company capitalization” caused a 10% decrease in the number of shares of preferred stock issued to the investor.
Putting a Cap On It
Negotiating a financing is anything but “simple.” This article was written to help you with one of those challenges by explaining the mechanics of a Valuation Cap SAFE, including the impacts that a negotiated definition of “company capitalization” can have on the outcome of an investment. There are many considerations when negotiating a SAFE, but one of the best negotiating tactics is understanding how even a small change can make big differences.
[divide]
Gabriel Riekhof is an attorney at Husch Blackwell, a leading law firm that provides unparalleled service and industry-specific solutions to clients nationwide. He has experience working with entrepreneurs, investors and corporations on various aspects of equity financing, including angel, venture, and crowdfunding deals. He has helped clients raise capital, grow their businesses, and successfully exit.
2024 Startups to Watch
stats here
Related Posts on Startland News
Founder of defunct Symptomly shares lessons from failure
Failure is a touchy subject. But for Derek Bereit — the former CEO and co-founder of mobile asthma tracking company Symptomly — his company’s failure was an opportunity shrouded in a difficult situation. Rather than sulking, Bereit sat down with Startland News to discuss Symptomly’s demise, the lessons it provided him and the possibilities that…
Founders discuss tough decisions entrepreneurs face
Two founders took the stage at Kansas City’s chapter of 1 Million Cups to discuss the vast variety of tough decisions entrepreneurs face when starting and running a business. Stuart Ludlow, co-founder of RFP 365 and Sarah Shipley, co-founder of BikeWalkKC, offered insights and advice for those launching a business. Read about RFP365’s recent funding…
KC’s first innovation officer reflects on work, city’s tech future
After more than two years of service, Ashley Hand is leaving the driver’s seat of Kansas City’s innovation efforts. Hand, who soon will be departing as Kansas City’s chief innovation officer, was tasked with implementing innovative strategies to improve how city government can better serve Kansas Citians. The city will be accepting applications for the…
Former Sprint COO LeMay dishes on KC capital, failure
There are few people in Kansas City more connected into the area’s investor, corporate and startup community than FarmLink CEO Ron LeMay. Also now managing director of Kansas City-based OpenAir Equity Partners, LeMay frequently sees the successes and failures of the metro area’s capital landscape. The former Sprint COO recently spoke with dozens of Kansas…
- « Previous
- 1
- …
- 86
- 87
- 88