Coty Beasley addresses ‘the Singularity’ and our impending doom

July 27, 2016  |  Coty Beasley

Photo by Greg Rakozy

Editor’s note: On a daily basis, Coty Beasley translates the jargon-filled world of technology for clients of his tech consultancy. The Words that Frustrate (WTF) series aims to offer readers some clarity in an industry dominated by techies’ confusing argot. The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.


Let’s start with a mind experiment: you’ve just consumed a significant amount of barbeque and beer, and you’ve fallen ill. You stumble into bed shaking from meat sweats and slip into a Kurzweilian fever dream.

Coty Beasley artificial intelligence

Coty Beasley

At the nexus of philosophy and futurism, a cluster of neurons connect to form a heavy question in your mind. Will humans ever progress so far that they can control their own evolution or perhaps be displaced by their own creations?

Typical Thursday afternoon, amirite?

Well, dear reader, this question has flashed across the minds of many great thinkers like Ray Kurzweil, Isaac Asimov and William Gibson, growing over time to form the hypothesis of “the Singularity.”

In all likelihood, you’re already familiar with the idea even if you don’t already know it yet.

Remember that little film from Spike Jonze called Her? Maybe you saw the critically demonized movies Lucy or Transcendence? Hell, even the space baby from 2001 — they all play with the concept. One day, we either become gods through our technological progress, masters of the physical universe around us, or our technology will become sentient and grow past us. (By the way, go see Her. It’s maybe one of the best movies ever. Seriously.)

While this seems far-fetched, the Singularity might simply be a logical arrival if we continue surviving and growing as a species.

Take a look at this chart:

singularity

If we continue our computational trends in the exponential fashion we have so far, this is what we’re looking at for technological chutzpah; we’ll out-compute insects, then simple animals, and finally a human mind. In short order, we’ll have machines that can outthink the combined power of all of humanity.

For a modern context, researchers believe that a human mind can think about 30 times better than our best supercomputers. Given that computers could only rub a couple bits together a few decades ago, that shows the progress we’ve made in a very, very short time.

In films I, Robot, Terminator, and Ex Machina, we see this play out with a robot developing sentience and sometimes deciding to harm their creators in the process. On the other side of this is the idea of Transhumanism, which is a variable in Singularity discourse, where we merge with technology to progress ourselves. This is related to the concepts of cyborgs and intelligence augmentation over sentient technology such as artificial intelligence.

So, in short, we’re looking at either overtaking our evolutionary path with advanced technology or creating technology that develops itself past our control and becomes a new lifeform that outstrips us intellectually. Inevitably, the endgame plays out with humans probably getting wiped out by our androids or humans transcending the physical plane.

Space babies, yo.

That’s what we’re dealing with, in a nutshell, though this article just scratches the surface of what’s out there on the subject. If you’re looking for more information, here’s some good places to start:

All in all, we either get cool robots, become cool robots, or create a new race of robot frenemies. I’ll chock that up as a win. Or an extinction event.

It’ll be interesting, I guess?


Coty Beasley is co-founder of Edge Up Sports, which uses machine learning and IBM Watson to provide sports data insights. Connect with Coty on Twitter @beacrea.

startland-tip-jar

TIP JAR

Did you enjoy this post? Show your support by becoming a member or buying us a coffee.

Tagged , , ,
Featured Business
    Featured Founder

      2016 Startups to Watch

        stats here

        Related Posts on Startland News

        Letter to the editor: What are Kansas City startups doing to connect with universities?

        By Tommy Felts | February 5, 2016

        Editor’s note: The following letter was submitted to Startland News by Ben Williams, assistant director of the Regnier Institute for Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the University of Missouri-Kansas City. The letter is in response to Startland Community Builder Adam Arredondo’s open letter to area universities on their engagement with the entrepreneurial community. Dear Adam, I’ve…

        Roberts: Goal-setting is more than making a plan

        By Tommy Felts | February 5, 2016

        I recently wrote a post about why I’m not setting a New Year’s resolution for 2016. In that post, I wondered if it’s time to try setting some real goals again after years of superficial goal setting and performance reviews left a bad taste in my mouth. I’ve been thinking a lot about how I…

        5 reasons your startup isn’t attracting investors

        By Tommy Felts | February 4, 2016

        Last week, Techstars managing director John Fein told us that one of the main complaints he hears from Kansas City investors is that there aren’t enough fundable startups. Investors may be right, but it’s not necessarily a lack of good ideas. Today, Kansas City investors are looking for more than the next big idea: they’re…

        Arredondo: Area universities, startups must collaborate for talent pipeline

        By Tommy Felts | February 2, 2016

        The following is an open letter from Startland News community builder Adam Arredondo to area universities. Dear Kansas City-area university leaders, I’ve spent a lot of time working with both students and representatives from many area universities over the last few years. It’s been an eye-opening, roller coaster of a learning experience which has driven…