Coty Beasley addresses ‘the Singularity’ and our impending doom

July 27, 2016  |  Coty Beasley

Photo by Greg Rakozy

Editor’s note: On a daily basis, Coty Beasley translates the jargon-filled world of technology for clients of his tech consultancy. The Words that Frustrate (WTF) series aims to offer readers some clarity in an industry dominated by techies’ confusing argot. The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.


Let’s start with a mind experiment: you’ve just consumed a significant amount of barbeque and beer, and you’ve fallen ill. You stumble into bed shaking from meat sweats and slip into a Kurzweilian fever dream.

Coty Beasley artificial intelligence

Coty Beasley

At the nexus of philosophy and futurism, a cluster of neurons connect to form a heavy question in your mind. Will humans ever progress so far that they can control their own evolution or perhaps be displaced by their own creations?

Typical Thursday afternoon, amirite?

Well, dear reader, this question has flashed across the minds of many great thinkers like Ray Kurzweil, Isaac Asimov and William Gibson, growing over time to form the hypothesis of “the Singularity.”

In all likelihood, you’re already familiar with the idea even if you don’t already know it yet.

Remember that little film from Spike Jonze called Her? Maybe you saw the critically demonized movies Lucy or Transcendence? Hell, even the space baby from 2001 — they all play with the concept. One day, we either become gods through our technological progress, masters of the physical universe around us, or our technology will become sentient and grow past us. (By the way, go see Her. It’s maybe one of the best movies ever. Seriously.)

While this seems far-fetched, the Singularity might simply be a logical arrival if we continue surviving and growing as a species.

Take a look at this chart:

singularity

If we continue our computational trends in the exponential fashion we have so far, this is what we’re looking at for technological chutzpah; we’ll out-compute insects, then simple animals, and finally a human mind. In short order, we’ll have machines that can outthink the combined power of all of humanity.

For a modern context, researchers believe that a human mind can think about 30 times better than our best supercomputers. Given that computers could only rub a couple bits together a few decades ago, that shows the progress we’ve made in a very, very short time.

In films I, Robot, Terminator, and Ex Machina, we see this play out with a robot developing sentience and sometimes deciding to harm their creators in the process. On the other side of this is the idea of Transhumanism, which is a variable in Singularity discourse, where we merge with technology to progress ourselves. This is related to the concepts of cyborgs and intelligence augmentation over sentient technology such as artificial intelligence.

So, in short, we’re looking at either overtaking our evolutionary path with advanced technology or creating technology that develops itself past our control and becomes a new lifeform that outstrips us intellectually. Inevitably, the endgame plays out with humans probably getting wiped out by our androids or humans transcending the physical plane.

Space babies, yo.

That’s what we’re dealing with, in a nutshell, though this article just scratches the surface of what’s out there on the subject. If you’re looking for more information, here’s some good places to start:

All in all, we either get cool robots, become cool robots, or create a new race of robot frenemies. I’ll chock that up as a win. Or an extinction event.

It’ll be interesting, I guess?


Coty Beasley is co-founder of Edge Up Sports, which uses machine learning and IBM Watson to provide sports data insights. Connect with Coty on Twitter @beacrea.

startland-tip-jar

TIP JAR

Did you enjoy this post? Show your support by becoming a member or buying us a coffee.

Tagged , , ,
Featured Business
    Featured Founder

      2016 Startups to Watch

        stats here

        Related Posts on Startland News

        Help wanted: Addressing KC’s (big) techie shortage

        By Tommy Felts | April 26, 2016

        Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.   Kansas City posted nearly 7,700 STEM job openings in 2015 — but only filled 2,550 of them. That means that for every STEM job candidate, there were three job openings. That’s great for job searchers, but terrible for Kansas City business and…

        funding models

        The red carpet, garageband and laboratory of funding models

        By Tommy Felts | April 22, 2016

        Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone. “Funding! Funding! Funding!” It’s the warrior’s cry of the startup community. In the world of entrepreneurship, there’s an incredible amount of pressure to run a startup that can be described as “disruptive,” “innovative” and “scalable.” Those descriptions come with a hefty price tag,…

        startups vs. small business

        Kohrs: Genesis matters in the startup vs. small business debate

        By Tommy Felts | April 12, 2016

        Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.   What’s the real difference between a startup and a small business? There’s been a lot of people talking about this since the term “startup” first joined our vernacular during the dot-com bubble. I think it’s because our brains are wired to categorize…

        Kean Hong Kong

        Kean: From Hong Kong to Kansas City, coffee’s the constant in startup life

        By Tommy Felts | March 30, 2016

        Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.   My story began in 2012 as the startup scene in Kansas City was just blossoming. An ever-expanding group of motivated individuals from diverse backgrounds were launching awesome companies, and tech events were occurring more often and with bigger turnouts. When Matt Berkland…