Byrd: What we can learn from 5 corporate innovation blunders

April 28, 2016  |  Louis Byrd

Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.


Most corporations don’t want innovation, they just say they do.

Corporate leaders talk about radical and disruptive ideas, but is that truly all that innovation is?

Louis Byrd

Louis Byrd

In it’s purest form, innovation creates more effective processes, products and ideas that will in turn increase the likelihood of success. But for many corporations, innovation is hard.

Innovation requires change, which for risk-adverse corporate leaders, is the type of friction that does not net a good return. So what do they do? They say “innovation,” but continue to thrive in the status quo.

Too many corporations are miles from an innovative mindset, and “innovation” has instead become one of the many buzz words spewed around corporate circles and lacking any depth.

I sit in on countless executive team meetings and frequently consult corporate leaders. People become bright-eyed and bushy-tailed when it’s time to talk innovative ideas; however, when it comes to acting on those ideas, eyes dim, tails droop and nothing happens.

After years watching big businesses in action, I’ve narrowed the causes of the corporate innovation problem to these five:

1) Called the “innovator’s dilemma,” companies are too wrapped up maintaining their existing business lines (e.g. gas-fueled cars) to invest enough in innovative new lines of business (e.g. the electric car). Companies like Tesla, Uber, Airbnb and locally Blooom have turned established industries on their heads by taking advantage of this mindset.

2) Employees are not given flexibility to bring innovative ideas to the table. Rigid cultures and constant demand to maintain the status quo forces smart people to do just enough stay under the radar and keep their job. Even when given a place to do so, ideas are seldomly used or the systems to encourage employee innovation become stagnant.

3) Big companies have overly complicated approval structures to keep out bad ideas, which can also stall or completely tank the good ones. Every department — from finance and marketing to R&D and production — top-level management must give the nod before an idea goes anywhere.

4) Despite each level of management weighing in on an idea, they rarely actually talk to each other. Communication occurs on a need-to-know basis and “collaboration” is synonymous with “updates.”

5) Even when companies invest in innovation, they often don’t take advantage of game-changing opportunities due to their size and market position. If even after vetting and testing an idea flops, corporate image and reputations are on the line.

So with all that weighing against an emerging idea, how do corporations make innovation happen? By realizing three basic principles.

The three truths to making corporate innovation happen

Innovation does not take place in a vacuum.

Acting on ideation needs structure, process and flexibility in management as well as throughout the entire business. Big ideas take place all the time, but too often end up in an infinite loop of planning and never moving forward. Corporations need to create a framework within which to move ideas forward while keeping them grounded in market realities.

Nobody can predict innovation success.

Remember when Netflix launched Qwikster? Probably not (which tells you something about how valid reason No. 5 above is). Despite that, it DID almost kill the company because Netflix wasn’t diversified enough to handle failure.

Years later when Netflix started producing its own shows, they knew from the outset that some shows would flop while others would be instant hits. They built systems and processes to handle the highly speculative and unpredictable success of innovation. It was a risk, but it paid off.

Innovation is inherently prone to uncertainty, but corporate innovation is still possible. Institutionalized innovation means diversifying investments so the failure of an idea doesn’t kill the company. It is not about blindly investing in ideas, but doing so strategically and with a purpose while understanding that success or failure is often unpredictable.

Innovation is Binary.

An idea is either going to work or not. You can learn a great deal from both.

While I vote for the word innovation to move to the corporate jargon list, if you truly want to make it a reality at your corporation, then do it!


 

Louis Byrd is the founder of Mellie Blue Branding, a cross-cultural branding agency that helps companies elevate their brands through strategy, creativity and the fundamental idea of being more human. Follow Byrd on Twitter @SiuolByrd.

Tagged , , , , , , , ,
Featured Business
    Featured Founder
      [adinserter block="4"]

      2016 Startups to Watch

        stats here

        Related Posts on Startland News

        Roberts: Can’t stand the options? Disrupt elections with a vote for nobody

        By Tommy Felts | March 18, 2016

        Editor’s Note: The following piece was written by Melissa Roberts on how voters who have made the decision not to vote for the available candidates should still submit a ballot — even if it’s blank. The opinions expressed in this commentary are hers. It’s election season, which means it’s probably best to avoid Facebook altogether. Despite…

        Sharing economy labors over lawsuits, paradigm shift for cyber security law

        By Tommy Felts | March 17, 2016

        Here’s this week’s dish on the sharing economy, the issues with backdoor encryption, and corporate-to-startup collaboration. Check out more in this series here.   AustinInno – The gig economy is at a crossroads as lawsuits, innovative benefits expand As the sharing or “gig” economy expands with companies like Uber and Lyft, it’s not just permit…

        The WTF Series: Triple constraint

        By Tommy Felts | March 10, 2016

        One of the hardest parts of software development is managing stakeholder expectations. Of course, everyone wants as much as they can get, as fast as possible, for the lowest price.  Why wouldn’t you?   The problem is that most programmers get frustrated when a stakeholder asks for too much too fast, and don’t know how…

        Titans of Kansas City tech combine forces for talent creation

        By Tommy Felts | March 9, 2016

        Kansas City isn’t unique in its high demand for talented techies. But perhaps what is setting the area apart is its collaborative approach to creating, recruiting and retaining tech talent in the Kansas City metro. Dozens of area tech companies engaged in a panel discussion Wednesday on practical steps that companies can take to win…