Company capitalization: The most overlooked definition in your SAFE 

March 25, 2024  |  Gabriel Riekhof

Gabriel Riekhof, Husch Blackwell

Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone. Gabriel Riekhof is an attorney at Husch Blackwell, a leading law firm that provides unparalleled service and industry-specific solutions to clients nationwide.

Introduced by Y Combinator in 2013 as an alternative to traditional convertible notes, a “Simple Agreement for Future Equity” or “SAFE” aims to streamline the investment process for early-stage startups by providing a simpler instrument for selling equity.

Although the document has the word “simple” in the title, founders can rarely answer the most fundamental question posed by a SAFE: How many shares will the SAFE convert into?

This article aims to help you answer that question. 

The Mechanics of a SAFE

Typically, there are two distinct forms of SAFE that Y Combinator publishes for a founder to choose from to incentivize an investor to purchase a SAFE: (i) the Discount SAFE and (ii) the Valuation Cap SAFE. This article discusses the Valuation Cap SAFE only.

In “simple” terms, a Valuation Cap SAFE sets an agreed upon maximum future valuation of the company issuing the SAFE that “caps” the per share “conversion price” used to convert the SAFE into preferred stock. All else equal, a lower valuation cap results in a lower per share conversion price. A lower conversion price means the investor’s original investment amount will purchase more shares. The more shares an investor receives, the greater the investor’s equity in the company, and therefore less equity remains with the founders.

At the risk of losing your interest this early in the article, I’m going to take a risk and give you the formula that governs the operation of a Valuation Cap SAFE. It does not have to make sense, yet. Just use it as a reference while you read the next paragraphs and examples: 

S = P / CP 

S = Shares of preferred stock that the SAFE will convert into. 

P = Purchase Price of the SAFE (the investment amount). 

CP = Conversion Price = X / Y. 

X = Valuation Cap.

Y = Company Capitalization. 

Example 1: Using the Valuation Cap 

If an investor purchased a SAFE for $50,000 (P) with a $1,000,000 Valuation Cap (X), and the Company has a Company Capitalization of 1,000,000 (Y), then the Conversion Price is $1.00 (CP). The $50,000 investment would convert into 50,000 shares (S).

50,000 shares = $50,000 / $1.00 because the conversion price equals $1,000,000 / 1,000,000 

Now, let’s increase the valuation cap to see the impact it has on the number of shares issued to the investor. 

Example 2: Using the Valuation Cap (again) 

If an investor purchased a SAFE for $50,000 (P) with a $10,000,000 Valuation Cap (X), and the Company has a Company Capitalization of 1,000,000 (Y), then the Conversion Price is $10.00 (CP). The $50,000 investment would convert into 5,000 shares (S).

5,000 shares = $50,000 / $10.00 because the conversion price equals $10,000,000 / 1,000,000 

Immediately, you can see the magnifying effect the valuation cap has on the resulting number of shares of preferred stock issued to the investor. 

Shifting Focus: Company Capitalization 

In explaining the valuation cap formula above, I made the mistake that I see many founders make: I only focused on the conversion price’s numerator (the valuation cap, X) and I ignored the conversion price’s denominator (the company capitalization, Y).

But, what if, instead of manipulating the conversion price by increasing or decreasing the valuation cap, X, we negotiated a more advantageous company capitalization, Y? That is, what if we increased or decreased the denominator of the conversion price formula?

What is Company Capitalization?

First, “company capitalization” is an agreed upon value representing the number of shares the company has issued. Y Combinator’s standard definition includes an aggregate of the following shares (but remember, parties can negotiate this definition): 

  1. All shares of capital stock issued and outstanding; 
  2. All converting securities, such as SAFEs and convertible notes; 
  3. All granted stock options; and 
  4. All shares reserved for future grant under the company’s option plan.

Example 3: Using Company Capitalization 

Using Y Combinator’s standard definition above, a company with 900,000 shares of common stock outstanding, no SAFEs or convertible debt, no options granted, and 100,000 shares reserved for issuance in the Company’s option pool has a “company capitalization” of 1,000,000. Remember, “company capitalization” is an aggregate of A through D above. 

If an investor purchased a SAFE for $50,000 (P) with a $1,000,000 Valuation Cap (X), and the Company has a Company Capitalization of 1,000,000 (Y), then the Conversion Price is $1.00 (CP). The $50,000 investment would convert into 50,000 shares (S).

50,000 shares = $50,000 / $1.00 because the conversion price equals $1,000,000 / 1,000,000 

Now, what if we changed the definition of “company capitalization” to exclude the shares we reserved for issuance in our option pool, but never issued?

Example 4: Excluding Option Pool Shares 

If the definition of “company capitalization” excludes shares reserved for issuance under the company’s option plan, a company with 900,000 shares of common stock outstanding, no SAFEs issued, no options granted, and 100,000 shares reserved for issuance in the Company’s option pool has a Company Capitalization totaling 900,000. 

If an investor purchased a SAFE for $50,000 (P) with a $1,000,000 Valuation Cap (X), and the Company has a Company Capitalization of 900,000 (Y), then the Conversion Price is $1.11 (CP). The $50,000 investment would convert into 45,000 shares (S). 

45,000 shares = $50,000 / $1.11 because the conversion price equals $1,000,000 / 900,000 

This definitional change of “company capitalization” caused a 10% decrease in the number of shares of preferred stock issued to the investor. 

Putting a Cap On It

Negotiating a financing is anything but “simple.” This article was written to help you with one of those challenges by explaining the mechanics of a Valuation Cap SAFE, including the impacts that a negotiated definition of “company capitalization” can have on the outcome of an investment. There are many considerations when negotiating a SAFE, but one of the best negotiating tactics is understanding how even a small change can make big differences. 

Gabriel Riekhof is an attorney at Husch Blackwell, a leading law firm that provides unparalleled service and industry-specific solutions to clients nationwide. He has experience working with entrepreneurs, investors and corporations on various aspects of equity financing, including angel, venture, and crowdfunding deals. He has helped clients raise capital, grow their businesses, and successfully exit.

startland-tip-jar

TIP JAR

Did you enjoy this post? Show your support by becoming a member or buying us a coffee.

Tagged ,
Featured Business
    Featured Founder

      2024 Startups to Watch

        stats here

        Related Posts on Startland News

        Blake Miller: Missouri should scrap its ‘Show Me’ slogan

        By Tommy Felts | February 18, 2016

        Editor’s note: The following piece was inspired by recent news that Acre Designs, a startup that launched in Kansas City, will be relocating to San Francisco after facing a tepid, area investor market.    Cue the somber violin music. Another sad, all-too-familiar Kansas City story recently played out with news that Acre Designs will be leaving the…

        Byrd: How the Silicon Prairie can avoid Silicon Valley’s diversity issues

        By Tommy Felts | February 16, 2016

        When Google and Intel first released their employment statistics in 2014, the topic of diversity was nowhere as elevated as it is today in corporate circles. Silicon Valley and its many companies from large tech giants down to startups are under the diversity and inclusion microscope. Why all of the emphasis on diversity? Demographically our…

        Dickson: Kansas City’s ‘show me’ mentality is stagnating its startups

        By Tommy Felts | February 11, 2016

        Editor’s note: Net-zero home-building startup Acre Designs, which found its start in Kansas City, recently entered the world’s best business accelerator program: Y Combinator. After facing a tepid investor market in Kansas City, the company will be staying in the San Francisco area after the program’s conclusion. Kansas City fosters an enviable work ethic, steady…

        The WTF series: 6 common computing languages

        By Tommy Felts | February 9, 2016

        On a daily basis, Ben Kittrell translates the jargon-filled world of technology for clients of his tech consultancy. The Words that Frustrate (WTF) series aims to offer readers some clarity in an industry dominated by techies’ confusing argot.   If you want to see a bloodbath, lock a .NET and a Java programmer in the…