Federal data privacy laws are coming; Here’s what you should consider

March 29, 2019  |  Ryan Weber

Ryan Weber, KC Tech Council

Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone. Ryan Weber, KC Tech Council president, on Tuesday testified before a U.S. Senate subcommittee on “Small Business Perspectives on a Federal Data Privacy Framework.”

I recently had the privilege of testifying before a U.S. Senate Subcommittee, chaired by U.S. Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kansas, about the potential impacts federal data privacy laws could have on small and startup tech businesses. You can read our full testimony here.

Before I ask you to contact your elected officials — and you should — it’s important everyone understand what’s coming because this law won’t only impact businesses. Anyone who stores or shares data over the web will be affected. And unless someone printed this piece for you to read, this means you.

The European Union (EU) was among the first to pass data privacy laws called the General Data Protection Rights (GDPR). These laws don’t just impact EU-based companies or those doing business there. The same rights protect the users, individuals, from the EU who visit websites, regardless of where the company with the website is located.

Last year, California passed the Consumer Protection Act (CCPA) rather swiftly and shocked many in the tech industry. Though different in many ways, the spirit of this law has some of the core principles written in GDPR. Many other states have soon followed suit and proposed their own set of statutes. The resulting effect could be a patchwork of varying state-by-state laws, confusing users and making compliance nearly impossible for companies.

In my conversations with tech companies, big and small, there is strong support for the U.S. to pursue overarching data privacy laws at a federal level. There is little to no support for states to continue and pass their patchwork of individual laws. The cost to comply with could be overwhelming for small and startup companies. Enforcement would also be inconsistent. In other words, it’d be a mess. Therefore, it’s crucial Congress act to preempt these state laws with a sensible federal law.

As this legislation is developed by Congress, here are key questions for tech companies to consider:

  1. How should Congress US control the “bad actors,” without overregulating everyone else?
  2. What entity should be enforcing these laws? Should states have a role with enforcement?
  3. Regarding enforcement, how should fines be determined? What about on the first offense?
  4. How should Congress define sensitive data?
  5. If exemptions for small business were created, how should Congress define a small business?

Data privacy is a complicated issue, and these questions are only a small part of the overall debate. A draft bill is forthcoming, and this conversation will continue to heat up once we have something tangible to debate. In the meantime, I encourage KC’s tech community to continue to discuss this issue. And yes, I want you to contact your elected officials, and I think they’d appreciate your thoughts on the questions above. Your voice matters and they do listen.

Ryan Weber is president of the KC Tech Council, a nonpartisan, regional advocate for the Kansas City tech industry.

startland-tip-jar

TIP JAR

Did you enjoy this post? Show your support by becoming a member or buying us a coffee.

Tagged , ,
Featured Business
    Featured Founder

      2019 Startups to Watch

        stats here

        Related Posts on Startland News

        Chris Brown Venture Legal

        Chris Brown: 37 lessons from five years of being my own boss

        By Tommy Felts | December 27, 2018

        Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone. Chris Brown is the founder of Venture Legal where he represents startups, freelancers, and small businesses. This column (originally published by Venture Legal) is intended to be general in detail and does not constitute legal advice. Five years ago I took a huge…

        2018 Startups to Watch

        Year-end roundup: Checking in with Startland’s 2018 Startups to Watch

        By Tommy Felts | December 21, 2018

        It was a year of refinement, said Chris Goode, as well as a time to rejoice amid highs and lows at Ruby Jean’s Juicery. Startland checked in with the founder, along with his fellow 2018 Startups to Watch companies, to see if the past 12 months unfolded as predicted. While working to expand Ruby Jean’s…

        American Voter App

        American Voter App gives power, political sway back to the people, founders say

        By Tommy Felts | December 20, 2018

        Gamifying the political process could score a more engaged voting public, said Dan Prince, co-founder of the American Voter App, explaining the still-developing technology would be the first to put the power of the ballot box conveniently into users’ smartphones, he said. “We all realize our obligation to be informed and educated and vote on…

        Jim Malle, Economic Development Corporation of Kansas City, LaunchKC

        LaunchKC pivoting from annual grants contest to supporting industry verticals, accelerators

        By Tommy Felts | December 14, 2018

        LaunchKC is expected to focus on specific business verticals in 2019 — an effort to bring companies to Kansas City that can fill industry gaps, said Jim Malle. A revamped version of the annual grants competition eventually would grow those verticals into individual accelerator programs, said Malle, business development officer at the Economic Development Corporation…