Beth Ellyn McClendon: If you want investors, skip LLCs and form a C-Corp

May 11, 2018  |  Beth Ellyn McClendon

Beth McClendon

Editor’s note: Beth Ellyn McClendon is a seed-stage investor with board and advisory board experience. She previously worked in design and product management for Google Mapping, Android, YouTube, Cisco and Netscape. The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.

So, you’re planning a startup, you’ve got a good lawyer and now you’re thinking about how to incorporate your business.

If you’re just starting out, it’s tempting to go for the flexibility and simplicity of an LLC. But if you plan to raise venture capital, forming a C-Corporation may be a better place to start.

In simple terms, if you incorporate as an LLC, your startup doesn’t pay taxes. The profits and losses “pass-through” the business to you and are reported on your personal tax return. If there are several co-owners, or “members,” the LLC generates a K-1 tax form for every member, listing the profits and losses that need to be reported.

If you’re a founder, that sounds great — straightforward and simple. But if you’re an active startup investor, it probably adds more complications than it’s worth.

Investing in a C-Corp startup generally creates only one tax event for an investor and it isn’t triggered until the investment “resolves” in some way. For example:

  • When a startup is sold, investors report and pay tax on the profit.
  • When a startup goes under, investors report and deduct the loss.
  • When a startup IPOs, investors sell their stock and report the sale.
  • Theoretically, dividends would also generate a tax event but they don’t come into play much in startup investing. C-Corp startups tend to pour profits back into the growth of the company.

On the other hand, when startup investors put money into an LLC, they become “members” and take on a yearly tax obligation. Investors must wait for the LLC to generate a K-1 and include it in their personal tax return, each and every year for as long as they hold the investment.

Further complicating things, if the investor isn’t a co-resident in the LLC’s location, they may become subject to filing yearly taxes in a different state or a different country. Investors are also obligated to report and pay taxes on an LLC’s profits whether or not the LLC chooses to distribute earnings.

Because of this, LLCs do distribute earnings to “members” to cover their tax liability, which can bleed money off a startup that might otherwise be poured back into its growth.

If that sounds like a small price to pay — scale it up. For VCs and active angel investors with multiple investments per year, this quickly adds up to a substantial and recurring burden. Some venture funds, depending on the composition of their limited partners, aren’t even able to consider an LLC for funding.

LLC founders often pitch me by saying, “We’ve written a lot of provisions into our LLC to make it behave like a C-Corp” and that may be true, but it won’t make fundraising easier. If you’re trying to make your LLC behave like a C-Corp, it probably needs to be a C-Corp.

Startup investors like ‘standard’ paperwork. They like to invest in C-Corps, particularly Delaware C-Corps, because it’s a well-worn path. Federal and state law does most of the heavy lifting by default. It limits shareholder liability. It makes equity compensation and stock ownership fairly straightforward. It roughly defines what corporate governance must look like and requires a Board of Directors. It provides some specific tax benefits and keeps the tax complexity of investment down to a minimum.

As with all things in business, you should walk through your options with a good legal advisor and, if you don’t need to raise funds, do whatever suits you. But if you plan to raise money, operating as an LLC may limit your pool of interested investors, so choose wisely.

Beth Ellyn McClendon is a seed stage investor with board and advisory board experience. She previously worked in design and product management for Google Mapping, Android, YouTube, Cisco and Netscape. She holds patents in mapping, navigation and monetization.’ Follow her on Twitter @bemcclendon.

startland-tip-jar

TIP JAR

Did you enjoy this post? Show your support by becoming a member or buying us a coffee.

Tagged , , ,
Featured Business
    Featured Founder

      2018 Startups to Watch

        stats here

        Related Posts on Startland News

        Amid success, the Kansas City Startup Village is shrinking

        By Tommy Felts | January 14, 2016

        It’s Nov. 13, 2012, and Kansas City’s Spring Valley neighborhood is in a frenzy. TV vans line the streets near 4454 State Line Road, the first house to receive Google’s ultra fast Internet service in the Kansas City, Kan. neighborhood. Reporters jockey for access to a handful of entrepreneurs and techies that moved to area…

        Ebb and flow: The Kansas City Startup Village by the numbers

        By Tommy Felts | January 14, 2016

        Startland News created an infographic on the growth and shrinkage of the Kansas City Startup Village since its 2012 founding. Here’s a colorful interpretation of its ebb and flow, as presented by Startland’s Kat Hungerford. Read more about the KCSV’s history, successes and possible future here.  

        Shawnee passes tax measure to attract startups

        By Tommy Felts | January 13, 2016

        A tax incentive program that aims to attract high-growth startups to the City of Shawnee unanimously passed a city vote, paving the way for firms to tap a variety of benefits to alleviate initial costs. The city council voted 8-0 on the “Startup Workforce Relocation and Expansion Program,” which aims to encourage job growth and…

        Unearthing Kansas City’s startup gems (with your help)

        By Tommy Felts | January 12, 2016

        Last week, Startland News published its Top 10 startups and four honorable mentions to watch in 2016. By and large, the piece has been well received with thousands of readers issuing kudos to startups that made the list. But as with any subjective “Top 10-whatever” list, we expected grumbles about the worthiness of the startups…