Beth Ellyn McClendon: If you want investors, skip LLCs and form a C-Corp

May 11, 2018  |  Beth Ellyn McClendon

Beth McClendon

Editor’s note: Beth Ellyn McClendon is a seed-stage investor with board and advisory board experience. She previously worked in design and product management for Google Mapping, Android, YouTube, Cisco and Netscape. The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.

So, you’re planning a startup, you’ve got a good lawyer and now you’re thinking about how to incorporate your business.

If you’re just starting out, it’s tempting to go for the flexibility and simplicity of an LLC. But if you plan to raise venture capital, forming a C-Corporation may be a better place to start.

In simple terms, if you incorporate as an LLC, your startup doesn’t pay taxes. The profits and losses “pass-through” the business to you and are reported on your personal tax return. If there are several co-owners, or “members,” the LLC generates a K-1 tax form for every member, listing the profits and losses that need to be reported.

If you’re a founder, that sounds great — straightforward and simple. But if you’re an active startup investor, it probably adds more complications than it’s worth.

Investing in a C-Corp startup generally creates only one tax event for an investor and it isn’t triggered until the investment “resolves” in some way. For example:

  • When a startup is sold, investors report and pay tax on the profit.
  • When a startup goes under, investors report and deduct the loss.
  • When a startup IPOs, investors sell their stock and report the sale.
  • Theoretically, dividends would also generate a tax event but they don’t come into play much in startup investing. C-Corp startups tend to pour profits back into the growth of the company.

On the other hand, when startup investors put money into an LLC, they become “members” and take on a yearly tax obligation. Investors must wait for the LLC to generate a K-1 and include it in their personal tax return, each and every year for as long as they hold the investment.

Further complicating things, if the investor isn’t a co-resident in the LLC’s location, they may become subject to filing yearly taxes in a different state or a different country. Investors are also obligated to report and pay taxes on an LLC’s profits whether or not the LLC chooses to distribute earnings.

Because of this, LLCs do distribute earnings to “members” to cover their tax liability, which can bleed money off a startup that might otherwise be poured back into its growth.

If that sounds like a small price to pay — scale it up. For VCs and active angel investors with multiple investments per year, this quickly adds up to a substantial and recurring burden. Some venture funds, depending on the composition of their limited partners, aren’t even able to consider an LLC for funding.

LLC founders often pitch me by saying, “We’ve written a lot of provisions into our LLC to make it behave like a C-Corp” and that may be true, but it won’t make fundraising easier. If you’re trying to make your LLC behave like a C-Corp, it probably needs to be a C-Corp.

Startup investors like ‘standard’ paperwork. They like to invest in C-Corps, particularly Delaware C-Corps, because it’s a well-worn path. Federal and state law does most of the heavy lifting by default. It limits shareholder liability. It makes equity compensation and stock ownership fairly straightforward. It roughly defines what corporate governance must look like and requires a Board of Directors. It provides some specific tax benefits and keeps the tax complexity of investment down to a minimum.

As with all things in business, you should walk through your options with a good legal advisor and, if you don’t need to raise funds, do whatever suits you. But if you plan to raise money, operating as an LLC may limit your pool of interested investors, so choose wisely.

Beth Ellyn McClendon is a seed stage investor with board and advisory board experience. She previously worked in design and product management for Google Mapping, Android, YouTube, Cisco and Netscape. She holds patents in mapping, navigation and monetization.’ Follow her on Twitter @bemcclendon.

startland-tip-jar

TIP JAR

Did you enjoy this post? Show your support by becoming a member or buying us a coffee.

Tagged , , ,
Featured Business
    Featured Founder

      2018 Startups to Watch

        stats here

        Related Posts on Startland News

        The Kritiq

        Kritiq fashion show MADE for Kansas City designers

        By Tommy Felts | October 5, 2017

        Designers don’t need to go to the east or west coasts to pursue their dreams, Mark Launiu said. “There’s so much passion and grind here in Kansas City. And a lot of people on the outside don’t know that,” said Launiu, co-founder at MADE Urban Apparel. “We’re always overlooked because they think of just our…

        Vu Radley and Mark Launiu, Made Urban Apparel

        Random origins, but no fluke: MADE grinds to grand expansion

        By Tommy Felts | October 5, 2017

        The MADE Mobb is getting used to risk taking. “We know what it’s like to walk into something blind,” laughed Mark Launiu, co-founder at MADE Urban Apparel. Launiu, along with co-founders Vu Radley and Jonathan “JP” Platz, launched MADE in 2012 with the streetwear apparel line selling in just a few pop-up shops. Early partnerships…

        GOEX, Global Orphan Project

        T-shirt printer GOEX hopes to clad workers in dignity

        By Tommy Felts | October 4, 2017

        A Kansas City T-shirt screen printer has a lofty mission: Turn local purchases into global impact. “Your dollar has value in how it’s treating others across the world,” said Ryan Hudnall, engagement director at the Global Orphan Project. Tucked away near Wyandotte and 31st streets, GOEX serves as an offshoot of the Global Orphan Project,…

        Hyperloop

        Looping back? Missouri partners with Hyperloop to study 23-minute KC-St Louis route

        By Tommy Felts | October 3, 2017

        Missouri’s prospects for landing a Hyperloop route apparently aren’t off the rails after all. Despite the company revealing four U.S. finalist routes in September — which did not include a proposed route through the Show Me State – Hyperloop One announced Tuesday it has entered into a public-private partnership with the State of Missouri to conduct…