Jeff Shackelford: Why would KC want to build the next Silicon Valley?

April 6, 2017  |  Jeff Shackelford

Jeff Shackelford

Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone. 

I recently read an article that shows you can slant a story anyway you want and that many authors write to match their preconceived notions — whether it’s true or not.

The article that got me thinking about this was from Bloomberg’s Sarah McBride. In her piece titled “Why It’s So Hard to Build the Next Silicon Valley” and subtitled “Google brought its high-speed internet to Kansas City, but it didn’t turn the city into a tech paradise.”

I don’t know Ms. McBride and haven’t read any of her other writings so nothing I say is personal as I’m sure she is a terrific person. But, the notion that Kansas City is trying to build “the next Silicon Valley” makes me think she’s been taking full advantage of California’s recently-passed Proposition 64.

First, why would any city try and build the next Silicon Valley? Good luck moving Stanford University! As we’ve learned here in Kansas City, it’s best to use your existing strengths and resources to build an entrepreneurial ecosystem unique to your communities needs. As evidenced by its continued praise and published rankings, Kansas City is one of the hottest entrepreneurial cities in the U.S. and the world.  We’re doing just fine and you can actually afford to live here.

Secondly, had Ms. McBride done proper “due diligence,” she would have learned that Kansas City’s entrepreneurial history is older than Silicon Valley’s and runs deep. We don’t need to be anybody’s “next.”

Joyce Hall invented the greeting card and founded Hallmark Cards in 1910. Henry and Richard Bloch founded H&R Block in 1955. Sprint’s roots trace to 1899 as the Brown Telephone Company.  And just about the time the term “Silicon Valley” was gaining widespread use, Neal Patterson, Paul Gorup, and Cliff Illig were forming Cerner, now one of the world’s largest healthcare IT companies. And that’s just a few. I didn’t mention KS Southern Railways, DST, Garmin, Lockton, Seaboard, JE Dunn Construction, Bats Global Markets and many others.

Instead of trying to use someone else’s formula, this city has focused on capitalizing on existing resources — including being the first city for Google Fiber — recognizing gaps and working to fill them.  Kansas City is continuing to build a cohesive, comprehensive and sustainable ecosystem to support the city’s broad entrepreneurial community. The only “next” were trying to do is build the “next” generation of great Kansas City companies. And with recent exits like Bats Global Markets’ $3.2 billion deal and EyeVerify’s $100 million sale to Alibaba, I think we’re doing just fine!

So here’s my thought: All you “Silicon Valley” groupies who are tired of paying $3,000 per month for the 300 square-foot box you call home, move to Kansas City. You can actually have a home with a bedroom that’s not part of the kitchen. Your commute could be a 10-minute walk or a 20-minute drive. And oh yeah, I almost forgot, we also have Google Fiber!

With years of startup and Fortune 100  experience, Jeff Shackelford is the executive director of Digital Sandbox KC. Follow him on Twitter at @TheSandboxKC.

startland-tip-jar

TIP JAR

Did you enjoy this post? Show your support by becoming a member or buying us a coffee.

Tagged
Featured Business
    Featured Founder

      2017 Startups to Watch

        stats here

        Related Posts on Startland News

        Help wanted: Addressing KC’s (big) techie shortage

        By Tommy Felts | April 26, 2016

        Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.   Kansas City posted nearly 7,700 STEM job openings in 2015 — but only filled 2,550 of them. That means that for every STEM job candidate, there were three job openings. That’s great for job searchers, but terrible for Kansas City business and…

        funding models

        The red carpet, garageband and laboratory of funding models

        By Tommy Felts | April 22, 2016

        Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone. “Funding! Funding! Funding!” It’s the warrior’s cry of the startup community. In the world of entrepreneurship, there’s an incredible amount of pressure to run a startup that can be described as “disruptive,” “innovative” and “scalable.” Those descriptions come with a hefty price tag,…

        startups vs. small business

        Kohrs: Genesis matters in the startup vs. small business debate

        By Tommy Felts | April 12, 2016

        Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.   What’s the real difference between a startup and a small business? There’s been a lot of people talking about this since the term “startup” first joined our vernacular during the dot-com bubble. I think it’s because our brains are wired to categorize…

        Kean Hong Kong

        Kean: From Hong Kong to Kansas City, coffee’s the constant in startup life

        By Tommy Felts | March 30, 2016

        Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.   My story began in 2012 as the startup scene in Kansas City was just blossoming. An ever-expanding group of motivated individuals from diverse backgrounds were launching awesome companies, and tech events were occurring more often and with bigger turnouts. When Matt Berkland…