Gooding: Stop drinking the ‘competitive advantage’ kool-aid

May 23, 2016  |  Grant Gooding

competitive advantage kool-aid

Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone. Check out more from Grant Gooding here.


Your competitive advantage doesn’t exist anymore.

Grant Gooding

Grant Gooding

Not only is this true but the whole concept of “competitive advantage” as you understand it likely doesn’t exist either.

What’s taken its place is a cool new thing called “transient advantage.” Transient advantage is what happens when technology exponentially advances to the point that “cutting edge” perpetually becomes “yesterday’s news.” Maintaining long-term profitability based only on a product or service is almost impossible to do.  

Transient advantage, by definition, isn’t sustainable.

Previously, established companies had all the advantage when it came to researching, developing and launching a product or service. From market research to parts manufacturing to advertising and supply chain management, you had to have a big budget just to get off the ground.

Now, it’s possible for nearly anyone to enter the marketplace with an idea and be able to realize many of these logistical advantages. For example, suppliers have innovated cost efficiencies that allow them to produce smaller orders for smaller customers, eliminating market barriers to entry.

So if a business is no longer able to sustain true competitive advantage within its product or service deliverable, how can it survive? It’s not easy, but it can be done.

Sustainable competitive advantage may be dead on the production line, but it’s alive and well in the minds of consumers.

Consider how difficult would it be for a competitor to take “greeting cards” away from Hallmark, “low prices” from Walmart, or “search” from Google. The competitive advantages of these brands are predicated on their ability to create and dominate a category in the mind and therefore the marketplace.

These brands have real competitive advantage in the form of mindshare dominance within their respective industries. This dominance allows them to profit from overall growth of the industry. It allows them to set the rules for what the industry’s innovation looks like. It allows them to change the playing field.

The consumer’s mind is theirs to shape because they create and own their respective industries.

Consider the “affordable airline,” Southwest Airlines. Southwest entered the marketplace asserting they have the cheapest available flights. However, even during their inflight introductions, they now boast that the aren’t the most affordable, but that they provide better, no-hassle service at a low cost.

Despite no longer truly having the competitive advantage on being the cheapest, they are one of the few airlines that regularly make a profit while owning that visceral “affordable” position in our minds.

If you are relying on your product’s functionality to build your brand, you are fighting a losing battle.  

Here’s what to focus on instead.

  1.    Identify the emotional needs of your customer.
  2.    Figure out how your product is objectively different relative to available alternatives.
  3.    Align No. 1 and No. 2 to narrow your target market to a specific customer.

If you don’t, you will be forced to rely on communicating a functional competitive advantage that lasts only as long as the next new thing — which these days is hardly any time at all.


Grant Gooding is a brand strategist & CEO of Lenexa-based Proof Positioning, a firm that uses consumer insights to show business owners how to build a powerful brand by knowing, not guessing. Grant is passionate about educating in the areas of entrepreneurship and brand philosophy.

startland-tip-jar

TIP JAR

Did you enjoy this post? Show your support by becoming a member or buying us a coffee.

2016 Startups to Watch

    stats here

    Related Posts on Startland News

    Letter to the editor: What are Kansas City startups doing to connect with universities?

    By Tommy Felts | February 5, 2016

    Editor’s note: The following letter was submitted to Startland News by Ben Williams, assistant director of the Regnier Institute for Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the University of Missouri-Kansas City. The letter is in response to Startland Community Builder Adam Arredondo’s open letter to area universities on their engagement with the entrepreneurial community. Dear Adam, I’ve…

    Roberts: Goal-setting is more than making a plan

    By Tommy Felts | February 5, 2016

    I recently wrote a post about why I’m not setting a New Year’s resolution for 2016. In that post, I wondered if it’s time to try setting some real goals again after years of superficial goal setting and performance reviews left a bad taste in my mouth. I’ve been thinking a lot about how I…

    5 reasons your startup isn’t attracting investors

    By Tommy Felts | February 4, 2016

    Last week, Techstars managing director John Fein told us that one of the main complaints he hears from Kansas City investors is that there aren’t enough fundable startups. Investors may be right, but it’s not necessarily a lack of good ideas. Today, Kansas City investors are looking for more than the next big idea: they’re…

    Arredondo: Area universities, startups must collaborate for talent pipeline

    By Tommy Felts | February 2, 2016

    The following is an open letter from Startland News community builder Adam Arredondo to area universities. Dear Kansas City-area university leaders, I’ve spent a lot of time working with both students and representatives from many area universities over the last few years. It’s been an eye-opening, roller coaster of a learning experience which has driven…