Gooding: Stop drinking the ‘competitive advantage’ kool-aid

May 23, 2016  |  Grant Gooding

competitive advantage kool-aid

Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone. Check out more from Grant Gooding here.


Your competitive advantage doesn’t exist anymore.

Grant Gooding

Grant Gooding

Not only is this true but the whole concept of “competitive advantage” as you understand it likely doesn’t exist either.

What’s taken its place is a cool new thing called “transient advantage.” Transient advantage is what happens when technology exponentially advances to the point that “cutting edge” perpetually becomes “yesterday’s news.” Maintaining long-term profitability based only on a product or service is almost impossible to do.  

Transient advantage, by definition, isn’t sustainable.

Previously, established companies had all the advantage when it came to researching, developing and launching a product or service. From market research to parts manufacturing to advertising and supply chain management, you had to have a big budget just to get off the ground.

Now, it’s possible for nearly anyone to enter the marketplace with an idea and be able to realize many of these logistical advantages. For example, suppliers have innovated cost efficiencies that allow them to produce smaller orders for smaller customers, eliminating market barriers to entry.

So if a business is no longer able to sustain true competitive advantage within its product or service deliverable, how can it survive? It’s not easy, but it can be done.

Sustainable competitive advantage may be dead on the production line, but it’s alive and well in the minds of consumers.

Consider how difficult would it be for a competitor to take “greeting cards” away from Hallmark, “low prices” from Walmart, or “search” from Google. The competitive advantages of these brands are predicated on their ability to create and dominate a category in the mind and therefore the marketplace.

These brands have real competitive advantage in the form of mindshare dominance within their respective industries. This dominance allows them to profit from overall growth of the industry. It allows them to set the rules for what the industry’s innovation looks like. It allows them to change the playing field.

The consumer’s mind is theirs to shape because they create and own their respective industries.

Consider the “affordable airline,” Southwest Airlines. Southwest entered the marketplace asserting they have the cheapest available flights. However, even during their inflight introductions, they now boast that the aren’t the most affordable, but that they provide better, no-hassle service at a low cost.

Despite no longer truly having the competitive advantage on being the cheapest, they are one of the few airlines that regularly make a profit while owning that visceral “affordable” position in our minds.

If you are relying on your product’s functionality to build your brand, you are fighting a losing battle.  

Here’s what to focus on instead.

  1.    Identify the emotional needs of your customer.
  2.    Figure out how your product is objectively different relative to available alternatives.
  3.    Align No. 1 and No. 2 to narrow your target market to a specific customer.

If you don’t, you will be forced to rely on communicating a functional competitive advantage that lasts only as long as the next new thing — which these days is hardly any time at all.


Grant Gooding is a brand strategist & CEO of Lenexa-based Proof Positioning, a firm that uses consumer insights to show business owners how to build a powerful brand by knowing, not guessing. Grant is passionate about educating in the areas of entrepreneurship and brand philosophy.

startland-tip-jar

TIP JAR

Did you enjoy this post? Show your support by becoming a member or buying us a coffee.

2016 Startups to Watch

    stats here

    Related Posts on Startland News

    Help wanted: Addressing KC’s (big) techie shortage

    By Tommy Felts | April 26, 2016

    Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.   Kansas City posted nearly 7,700 STEM job openings in 2015 — but only filled 2,550 of them. That means that for every STEM job candidate, there were three job openings. That’s great for job searchers, but terrible for Kansas City business and…

    funding models

    The red carpet, garageband and laboratory of funding models

    By Tommy Felts | April 22, 2016

    Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone. “Funding! Funding! Funding!” It’s the warrior’s cry of the startup community. In the world of entrepreneurship, there’s an incredible amount of pressure to run a startup that can be described as “disruptive,” “innovative” and “scalable.” Those descriptions come with a hefty price tag,…

    startups vs. small business

    Kohrs: Genesis matters in the startup vs. small business debate

    By Tommy Felts | April 12, 2016

    Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.   What’s the real difference between a startup and a small business? There’s been a lot of people talking about this since the term “startup” first joined our vernacular during the dot-com bubble. I think it’s because our brains are wired to categorize…

    Kean Hong Kong

    Kean: From Hong Kong to Kansas City, coffee’s the constant in startup life

    By Tommy Felts | March 30, 2016

    Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.   My story began in 2012 as the startup scene in Kansas City was just blossoming. An ever-expanding group of motivated individuals from diverse backgrounds were launching awesome companies, and tech events were occurring more often and with bigger turnouts. When Matt Berkland…