Gooding: Stop drinking the ‘competitive advantage’ kool-aid

May 23, 2016  |  Grant Gooding

competitive advantage kool-aid

Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone. Check out more from Grant Gooding here.


Your competitive advantage doesn’t exist anymore.

Grant Gooding

Grant Gooding

Not only is this true but the whole concept of “competitive advantage” as you understand it likely doesn’t exist either.

What’s taken its place is a cool new thing called “transient advantage.” Transient advantage is what happens when technology exponentially advances to the point that “cutting edge” perpetually becomes “yesterday’s news.” Maintaining long-term profitability based only on a product or service is almost impossible to do.  

Transient advantage, by definition, isn’t sustainable.

Previously, established companies had all the advantage when it came to researching, developing and launching a product or service. From market research to parts manufacturing to advertising and supply chain management, you had to have a big budget just to get off the ground.

Now, it’s possible for nearly anyone to enter the marketplace with an idea and be able to realize many of these logistical advantages. For example, suppliers have innovated cost efficiencies that allow them to produce smaller orders for smaller customers, eliminating market barriers to entry.

So if a business is no longer able to sustain true competitive advantage within its product or service deliverable, how can it survive? It’s not easy, but it can be done.

Sustainable competitive advantage may be dead on the production line, but it’s alive and well in the minds of consumers.

Consider how difficult would it be for a competitor to take “greeting cards” away from Hallmark, “low prices” from Walmart, or “search” from Google. The competitive advantages of these brands are predicated on their ability to create and dominate a category in the mind and therefore the marketplace.

These brands have real competitive advantage in the form of mindshare dominance within their respective industries. This dominance allows them to profit from overall growth of the industry. It allows them to set the rules for what the industry’s innovation looks like. It allows them to change the playing field.

The consumer’s mind is theirs to shape because they create and own their respective industries.

Consider the “affordable airline,” Southwest Airlines. Southwest entered the marketplace asserting they have the cheapest available flights. However, even during their inflight introductions, they now boast that the aren’t the most affordable, but that they provide better, no-hassle service at a low cost.

Despite no longer truly having the competitive advantage on being the cheapest, they are one of the few airlines that regularly make a profit while owning that visceral “affordable” position in our minds.

If you are relying on your product’s functionality to build your brand, you are fighting a losing battle.  

Here’s what to focus on instead.

  1.    Identify the emotional needs of your customer.
  2.    Figure out how your product is objectively different relative to available alternatives.
  3.    Align No. 1 and No. 2 to narrow your target market to a specific customer.

If you don’t, you will be forced to rely on communicating a functional competitive advantage that lasts only as long as the next new thing — which these days is hardly any time at all.


Grant Gooding is a brand strategist & CEO of Lenexa-based Proof Positioning, a firm that uses consumer insights to show business owners how to build a powerful brand by knowing, not guessing. Grant is passionate about educating in the areas of entrepreneurship and brand philosophy.

startland-tip-jar

TIP JAR

Did you enjoy this post? Show your support by becoming a member or buying us a coffee.

2016 Startups to Watch

    stats here

    Related Posts on Startland News

    Williams to critical Bloomberg piece: KC shouldn’t try to be Silicon Valley

    By Tommy Felts | March 17, 2017

    Editor’s note: The following piece is in response to a Bloomberg article critical of the Kansas City Startup Village and Kansas City’s ability to use Google Fiber to become the “next Silicon Valley.” Opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.  In 2012, Kansas City experienced what at the time must have felt like winning…

    Arredondo: Our education system is creating an army of unemployable people

    By Tommy Felts | March 14, 2017

    Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in the commentary are the author’s alone.  I have good and bad news. The good news? There are more than 5,700,000 jobs available in the United States as you read this — the most jobs available at any time in the history of our country. The bad news? As of 2012,…

    Former U.S. Labor official Chris Lu: KC can teach Trump how to create jobs

    By Tommy Felts | March 9, 2017

    Editor’s note: Chris Lu served as the U.S. Deputy Secretary of Labor during the Obama Administration, and he is now a Senior Fellow at the University of Virginia Miller Center. The opinions in this commentary are the author’s alone. For all of Donald Trump’s bluster about his job creation abilities, this week will provide one of…

    Melissa Roberts: How an Olathe hate crime affects your tech business

    By Tommy Felts | February 28, 2017

    Editor’s note: The opinions in this commentary are the author’s alone. In the startup world, outside the Facebook echo chamber, it can be hard to see how political trends impact your business. I understand why. When you’re struggling to weed through the constant churn of working the problem, identifying a new problem and working that…