Byrd: What we can learn from 5 corporate innovation blunders
April 28, 2016 | Louis Byrd
Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.
Most corporations don’t want innovation, they just say they do.
Corporate leaders talk about radical and disruptive ideas, but is that truly all that innovation is?
In it’s purest form, innovation creates more effective processes, products and ideas that will in turn increase the likelihood of success. But for many corporations, innovation is hard.
Innovation requires change, which for risk-adverse corporate leaders, is the type of friction that does not net a good return. So what do they do? They say “innovation,” but continue to thrive in the status quo.
Too many corporations are miles from an innovative mindset, and “innovation” has instead become one of the many buzz words spewed around corporate circles and lacking any depth.
I sit in on countless executive team meetings and frequently consult corporate leaders. People become bright-eyed and bushy-tailed when it’s time to talk innovative ideas; however, when it comes to acting on those ideas, eyes dim, tails droop and nothing happens.
After years watching big businesses in action, I’ve narrowed the causes of the corporate innovation problem to these five:
1) Called the “innovator’s dilemma,” companies are too wrapped up maintaining their existing business lines (e.g. gas-fueled cars) to invest enough in innovative new lines of business (e.g. the electric car). Companies like Tesla, Uber, Airbnb and locally Blooom have turned established industries on their heads by taking advantage of this mindset.
2) Employees are not given flexibility to bring innovative ideas to the table. Rigid cultures and constant demand to maintain the status quo forces smart people to do just enough stay under the radar and keep their job. Even when given a place to do so, ideas are seldomly used or the systems to encourage employee innovation become stagnant.
3) Big companies have overly complicated approval structures to keep out bad ideas, which can also stall or completely tank the good ones. Every department — from finance and marketing to R&D and production — top-level management must give the nod before an idea goes anywhere.
4) Despite each level of management weighing in on an idea, they rarely actually talk to each other. Communication occurs on a need-to-know basis and “collaboration” is synonymous with “updates.”
5) Even when companies invest in innovation, they often don’t take advantage of game-changing opportunities due to their size and market position. If even after vetting and testing an idea flops, corporate image and reputations are on the line.
So with all that weighing against an emerging idea, how do corporations make innovation happen? By realizing three basic principles.
The three truths to making corporate innovation happen
Innovation does not take place in a vacuum.
Acting on ideation needs structure, process and flexibility in management as well as throughout the entire business. Big ideas take place all the time, but too often end up in an infinite loop of planning and never moving forward. Corporations need to create a framework within which to move ideas forward while keeping them grounded in market realities.
Nobody can predict innovation success.
Remember when Netflix launched Qwikster? Probably not (which tells you something about how valid reason No. 5 above is). Despite that, it DID almost kill the company because Netflix wasn’t diversified enough to handle failure.
Years later when Netflix started producing its own shows, they knew from the outset that some shows would flop while others would be instant hits. They built systems and processes to handle the highly speculative and unpredictable success of innovation. It was a risk, but it paid off.
Innovation is inherently prone to uncertainty, but corporate innovation is still possible. Institutionalized innovation means diversifying investments so the failure of an idea doesn’t kill the company. It is not about blindly investing in ideas, but doing so strategically and with a purpose while understanding that success or failure is often unpredictable.
Innovation is Binary.
An idea is either going to work or not. You can learn a great deal from both.
While I vote for the word innovation to move to the corporate jargon list, if you truly want to make it a reality at your corporation, then do it!
Louis Byrd is the founder of Mellie Blue Branding, a cross-cultural branding agency that helps companies elevate their brands through strategy, creativity and the fundamental idea of being more human. Follow Byrd on Twitter @SiuolByrd.
Featured Business

2016 Startups to Watch
stats here
Related Posts on Startland News
Kauffman, ECJC: Stagnant US entrepreneurship is a diversity issue that throwing money at Big Business won’t fix
Women, people of color, and rural residents remain punished by systemic barriers to starting businesses, said Wendy Guillies in a nationwide call to action that unites powerful Kansas City entrepreneurism advocates. “America’s economy is out of balance. We’ve got businesses that have become too entrenched and powerful, while people and communities across America are being…
UMKC student-led FeedKC will pitch for donations, connections at Pure Pitch Rally
Continuing a tradition of showcasing student entrepreneurs, Tuesday’s Pure Pitch Rally is expected to feature a pitch from FeedKC, a group run by students at the University of Missouri-Kansas City. And thanks to a private donor to the UMKC Bloch School of Management, all funds designated for FeedKC will be matched up to $10,000. Click…
Report: KC tech industry brings in $12B, attracts Hyperloop, but city still struggling to fill talent pool
Despite facing a shortage of skilled talent, the tech industry in Kansas City contributed roughly $12 billion — or about 10 percent — to the local economy in 2018, according to an annual report released by the KC Tech Council, a nonprofit that aims to spur tech growth in the city. Nearly one in 10…

