Gooding: Narrow your focus to win on an exit

March 28, 2016  |  Grant Gooding

Photo by Olu Eletu

At the time it wasn’t quite so obvious, but now I realize that I was incredibly fortunate to spend the first part of my career in small-market mergers and acquisitions.

Grant Gooding

Grant Gooding

Turns out it’s an arena where one can acquire an incredible depth and breadth of business knowledge. On an almost daily basis, I was learning about the successes and failures of an endless variety of businesses, how they overcame obstacles and ultimately what those businesses were worth and how the transactions were structured.

After assessing and valuing literally hundreds of businesses over a decade, I began to notice an interesting pattern emerge. There was in inverse correlation between a company’s scope — the breadth/focus of what it does — and the multiple of EBITDA used to establish its selling price. 

This correlation infers that our instincts as business owners and much of traditional business theory could be doing more harm than good. The customary method of growing our business through diversification in order to mitigate risk is patently false.

To put it more simply, when it comes to your business: The less you do, the more you’re worth.

And here’s why.

These companies that “did less,” or had a very narrow focus, tended to be able to communicate their brand and what they did more simply. As a result, they were generally viewed as experts in their industry. They also tended to grow faster, have less debt and spent less money on marketing. And because they transacted for a higher multiple, the owners had more money in their pockets when the companies sold.

Conversely, those companies that “did more,” or had a very broad focus, generally had higher gross revenue but their profitability was less stable. This was because they had to manage multiple product or service lines, diverse customer segments, multiple sales channels and more complex infrastructures. They were less agile, and when everything was said and done, the ownership generally received a lower net payout when the companies sold.

To be effective, ignore your business survival instincts. Instead of diversifying what you stand for in the market, simplify and narrow your scope. “Do less” in the mind of your consumers and expect a higher return when it comes time to sell.


 

Grant Gooding is a brand strategist & CEO of Lenexa-based Proof Positioning, a firm that uses consumer insights to show business owners how to build a powerful brand by knowing, not guessing. Grant is passionate about educating in the areas of entrepreneurship and brand philosophy.

 

startland-tip-jar

TIP JAR

Did you enjoy this post? Show your support by becoming a member or buying us a coffee.

Tagged , ,
Featured Business
    Featured Founder

      2016 Startups to Watch

        stats here

        Related Posts on Startland News

        corporate innovation

        Byrd: What we can learn from 5 corporate innovation blunders

        By Tommy Felts | April 28, 2016

        Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone. Most corporations don’t want innovation, they just say they do. Corporate leaders talk about radical and disruptive ideas, but is that truly all that innovation is? In it’s purest form, innovation creates more effective processes, products and ideas that will in turn increase…

        Help wanted: Addressing KC’s (big) techie shortage

        By Tommy Felts | April 26, 2016

        Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.   Kansas City posted nearly 7,700 STEM job openings in 2015 — but only filled 2,550 of them. That means that for every STEM job candidate, there were three job openings. That’s great for job searchers, but terrible for Kansas City business and…

        funding models

        The red carpet, garageband and laboratory of funding models

        By Tommy Felts | April 22, 2016

        Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone. “Funding! Funding! Funding!” It’s the warrior’s cry of the startup community. In the world of entrepreneurship, there’s an incredible amount of pressure to run a startup that can be described as “disruptive,” “innovative” and “scalable.” Those descriptions come with a hefty price tag,…

        startups vs. small business

        Kohrs: Genesis matters in the startup vs. small business debate

        By Tommy Felts | April 12, 2016

        Editor’s note: The opinions expressed in this commentary are the author’s alone.   What’s the real difference between a startup and a small business? There’s been a lot of people talking about this since the term “startup” first joined our vernacular during the dot-com bubble. I think it’s because our brains are wired to categorize…